|
As rescuers sifted the rubble for survivors in
India, counselors in Turkey began to put into place a new program for
treating earthquake trauma victims. The world's disasters sometimes seem
to be chasing one another.
An MRDS team has moved into Golcuk, Turkey, to ascertain needs for continuing
trauma relief. The temblor that shook the eastern reaches of the Sea of
Marmara so violently on Aug. 17, 1999, passed in 45 seconds. Aftershocks
followed for months. A year-and-a-half later, for many the terror lives
today.
The dots on the maps move and the shapes and colors of the faces change.
In many ways, however, cataclysms of nature in developing nations follow
a common story line. First and foremost, poor people suffer far more from
natural disasters than those in the industrialized world. This difference
has been remarked in India.
T.N. Gupta, who led a committee of eminent engineers and scientists who
conducted a study on disasters for the government of India, told The New
York Times, "We had an earthquake in Latur that killed 9,700 people. An
earthquake of the same intensity in California killed five."
The January quake in Gujurat state claimed many more. As in Turkey, tens
of thousands died and many of them are bulldozed away with the rubble
as a public-health measure.
A United Nations study has determined that 90 percent of disaster victims
live in developing countries. In the case of earthquakes, some assume
lax building codes in less affluent lands; in fact, such is rarely the
case. In both Turkey and India, the quakes struck areas of high seismic
activity and the codes in place had factored in the increased risk. If
the buildings had been built to code, damage would have been contained
at much lower levels.
Two factors common to most developing nations explain the high tolls.
One is a proliferation of mid-rise apartment buildings in urban areas.
The other is a high incidence of corruption.
The Financial Express of India declared that, "A very large number of
deaths were avoidable, and happened simply because of a culture of lining
of pockets that is especially entrenched in municipal authorities and
the building trade."
Echoes of Turkey. The same cries went up, and just as belatedly. The
immediate costs in lives and in financial terms are not the only ones
that go soaring. Terrified survivors refuse to return to their homes,
even when those are habitable after only cosmetic damage.
The added expense of maintaining them by the thousands in temporary shelter
weighs on a burdened economy long after most foreign relief workers have
gone home.
In Turkey, a new trauma initiative opens and the work continues. In India,
it is just beginning.
--Bill
Koops
Top
|